Search This Blog

Sunday, January 16, 2022

CBCS SEM 1 Aristotle’s views and concept of tragedy in ‘The Poetics’

 

Aristotle’s views and concept of tragedy in ‘The Poetics’

A philosopher, an educator, a literary critic and a scientist, Aristotle was probably the most scholarly and influential of the classical and Greek philosophers. In his writings Aristotle considered, summarized, criticized and further developed all the rich intellectual traditions that he had inherited from his teacher Plato. Aristotle’s ‘Poetics’ has been the single most influential work in in all literary criticism. In the ‘Poetics’ Aristotle uses the same scientific analytical methods that he had he had successfully applied to the study of politics, ethics and natural sciences in order to determine the fundamental principles of the composition and content of tragedy.

Aristotle begins by listing the different kinds of poetry and remarks that all kinds of poetry are ‘mimetic’ or ‘imitative’. Both Aristotle and Plato saw in ‘mimesis’ the representation of nature. Poetic ‘mimesis’ is imitation of things as they could be, not as they are in the universal ideas. Thus poetry is much more philosophical than history that merely records what actually happened. Aristotle further insists that amongst poetry “tragedy’ is the most perfect form of ‘mimesis’ because it has a serious purpose and uses direct action rather than narrative.

The Greeks believed that tragedy was the highest form of drama and Aristotle’s ideas of tragedy were based on this belief. The ‘Poetics’examines the nature of tragedy and takes as its prime example Sophocles’ tragedy ‘Oedipus Rex’. Aristotle analyses the features and components of tragedy taking illustrations primarily from Sophocles, Aeschylus and Euripides. He defines tragedy as “ …an imitation of an action that is serious and also,as having magnitude, complete in itself, in appropriate and pleasurable language; …in a dramatic rather than narrative form, with incidents arousing pity and fear, wherewith to achieve a catharsis of these emotions.” The definition itself points out the features of an ideal tragedy that are (a) A good tragedy deals with one issue that is serious and of magnitude or having great importance and it is complete in itself, (b) The language of chorus should be easy and sung with rhythm and harmony, (c) Drama demands that the story need to be acted out, (d) A good tragedy arouses the twin emotions of pity and fear for the emotional built up and thereby preparing for (e) Catharsis, a purgation of the emotions. Catharsis is a purging or cleansing of the emotions- a release of the tension so as to achieve a neutral or stable emotional state. The catharsis is achieved when the tragic protagonist falls a victim of his “hamartia’, a particular flaw in the character or an error in judgement, bringing a disastrous change in the fortune of the tragic protagonist.

Aristotle next proceeds to analyse the six main elements or components of tragedy: (i) Plot, (ii) Character, (iii) Thought, (iv) Diction, (v) Melody and (vi) Spectacles. Thought denotes the intellectual qualities of the characters. Diction refers to the composition and the language. If ‘thought’ deals with what is said, ‘diction’ deals with how it is said. ‘Melody and spectacles are the accessories to pleasurably blend in the visual appearances and songs of the chorus appropriately within the play. Aristotle considers ‘character’ to be the second most important aspect of tragedy. The characters serve to advance the action of the story. The moral purpose of the characters should be clear to the audience and they must be believable personalities.

Aristotle considers ‘plot’ or ‘mythos’ that is the sum total of all the actions in the play, to be the most important of the six elements. The plot must be about “one complete action” that is unity of the plot; all the events and actions must direct towards one serious issue. Aristotle insists that a good plot is accompanied by two qualities (i) ‘Peripety’ and (ii) ‘Anagnorisis. ‘Peripety’ is the change in the state of things or a reversal in the fortune of the tragic protagonist. ‘Anagnorisis’ or discovery is the change from ignorance to knowledge. This is achieved in ‘Oedipus Rex’ when King Oedipus starts out “clueless” and slowly learns how he himself is responsible for all the mess.

Change by itself is not enough in order to achieve ‘catharsis’; the tragic protagonist must have specific characteristics to arouse the tragic emotions of pity and fear. Aristotle suggests that three kinds of plot should be avoided. Firstly, a totally good man must not pass from happiness to misery for the audience won’t pity him so much rather be angry for him. Secondly, a bad man must not pass from misery to happiness, for it would not be appealing to see evil rewarded. Thirdly, a bad man must not pass from happiness to misery for the audience won’t pity him for he deserved it. Aristotle concludes that the best kind of plot involves the misfortune of someone who is neither particularly good nor bad and whose downfall is the result of an error in judgement or ‘hamartia’.

Although Aristotle’s theories and his preoccupation with plot and character were grossly violated as drama passed from Shakespeare to Beckett, the overwhelming influence of Aristotle’s ideas and principles had a founding influence in the composition of tragedy on playwrights of all times all over the world.

No comments:

Post a Comment